Author |
Topic: BBC Basic for mac (Read 3177 times) |
|
admin
Administrator
member is offline
Posts: 1145
|
 |
Re: BBC Basic for mac
« Reply #5 on: Jun 30th, 2013, 4:28pm » |
|
on Jun 30th, 2013, 3:59pm, knudvaneeden wrote:| But because it is running in an Apple environment (e.g. Apple file system) this will require assumed much more effort to get everything running smoothly. |
|
No. CrossOver is a customised version of Wine, so whilst the issues of Wine's compatibility with Windows are relevant (and they can certainly affect BB4W) the fact that the host OS is MacOS rather than Linux ought not to result in any additional effort.
In case you didn't realise, CodeWeavers (who market CrossOver) are the leading contributors to Wine:
http://www.codeweavers.com/about/support_wine
Richard.
|
|
 Logged
|
|
|
|
admin
Administrator
member is offline
Posts: 1145
|
|
Re: BBC Basic for mac
« Reply #6 on: Jun 30th, 2013, 8:12pm » |
|
on Jun 30th, 2013, 4:40pm, knudvaneeden wrote:| I checked its behavior and it is in my opinion probably less straight forward than using a Microsoft Windows virtual machine |
|
Please read my message again; it had nothing whatever to do with the use of a virtual machine.
Richard.
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
admin
Administrator
member is offline
Posts: 1145
|
|
Re: BBC Basic for mac
« Reply #7 on: Jun 30th, 2013, 10:49pm » |
|
Quote:| Just look at the list of supported programs by CrossOver. Just a handful. BBCBASIC for Windows is not part of that either |
|
The degree of compatibility of BB4W with Wine is well known (it is good, except for one issue involving compiled EXEs with resources stored in a sub-directory). That it is so much better than it used to be is thanks to CodeWeavers!
As far as virtual machines are concerned, of course their compatibility is 'virtually' perfect - because a genuine copy of Windows is being run. But that isn't really running BB4W on a Mac at all: it's running BB4W on Windows on a Virtual PC on a Mac! You can't just launch a BB4W EXE under MacOS in the way CrossOver does. For most people (especially considering the cost involved) it's not a practical option.
Anyway, as far as I know nobody is interested in running BBC BASIC on a Mac (this is a stale thread, started about eighteen months ago).
Richard.
|
| « Last Edit: Jun 30th, 2013, 10:50pm by admin » |
Logged
|
|
|
|
admin
Administrator
member is offline
Posts: 1145
|
|
Re: BBC Basic for mac
« Reply #8 on: Jul 4th, 2013, 2:45pm » |
|
on Jul 4th, 2013, 2:12pm, knudvaneeden wrote:| At the moment of this writing as far as I know no such thorough testing of CrossOver with BBCBasic for Windows has been performed. |
|
As you are well aware, BB4W has been tested under Wine, and CrossOver is simply a custom version of Wine tailored to MacOs rather than Linux (which are very similar). So if, as you keep asserting, CrossOver is not an acceptable method of running BB4W on a Mac, presumably you also believe that Wine is not an acceptable method of running BB4W under Linux.
Even if I were to accept that argument, it is equally true that no "thorough testing" of BB4W has taken place under several other Operating System variants, such as Windows 8. Do you therefore believe that nobody should be attempting to use BBC BASIC under Windows 8 until such testing has taken place?
All this just reinforces my opinion that BBC BASIC has no future and that BB4W should be abandoned.
Richard.
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
admin
Administrator
member is offline
Posts: 1145
|
|
Re: BBC Basic for mac
« Reply #9 on: Jul 4th, 2013, 6:14pm » |
|
on Jul 4th, 2013, 5:26pm, knudvaneeden wrote:| Thanks for this update. That is (very) good news. |
|
I stated earlier in this thread that "The degree of compatibility of BB4W with Wine is well known (it is good, except for one issue involving compiled EXEs with resources stored in a sub-directory)" so you were already aware of it.
Quote:| Issues should have already been reported then long since, because at least some or even many users have been running BBCBASIC for Windows on Microsoft Windows 8. |
|
But you stated "thorough testing"; there is no way that a user can do that - only I have any chance of doing 'thorough' testing of BB4W, and no such testing has been attempted on Windows 8. In any case I have no evidence that anybody is routinely running BB4W under Windows 8.
Quote:| I would always vote for the continuing development of this fantastic computer language. |
|
You are of course entitled to your opinion, but I do not share it.
Richard.
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
